Author Topic: 572  (Read 191660 times)

M4wdFab

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22493
  • Karma: +11/-22
Re: 572
« Reply #180 on: July 27, 2012, 07:59:42 AM »
ya the front "foot print" i am not real crazy, but it kinda just ended up where it would be.  keeping room for the front shaft, 36" ish links, and petals will be forward of the front sub.  it will start to come together when tube gets bent, it may get changed a little, but its a start to get the drive train mounted up. 

M4wdFab

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22493
  • Karma: +11/-22
Re: 572
« Reply #181 on: July 27, 2012, 08:02:05 AM »
tall motor mounts will of course have a ton of tie in when tube starts to get run.  it has some CJ upper 250 wall links it it.  Motor mounts are all 3/8" plate and tabs shrong.  3" bushings.  i should get a seat before i mount the trans and case. 

mr.mindless

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15380
  • Karma: +2/-16
572
« Reply #182 on: July 27, 2012, 11:26:24 AM »
Sub seems ridiculously huge for its height on the chassis at this stage is what I'm thinking.
Quote from: etk300ex
oh lord!

M4wdFab

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22493
  • Karma: +11/-22
Re: 572
« Reply #183 on: July 27, 2012, 12:30:34 PM »
i guess i disagree, look how "big" Atom was  this is smaller. 

WB is longer than i wanted but most cars are actually 120-125 these days

Ryan

  • M4wd Vendor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3803
  • Karma: +3/-3
  • Superstar
    • Lifetime LED
Re: 572
« Reply #184 on: July 27, 2012, 12:44:54 PM »
That is the bottom of the car, right. Not an actual subframe. Its like Atom was, not like yours and mine are now. That square is the from itself.

gif

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1754
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 572
« Reply #185 on: July 27, 2012, 02:25:16 PM »
That is the bottom of the car, right. Not an actual subframe. Its like Atom was, not like yours and mine are now. That square is the from itself.


I would say its both.

Im just hypersensitive to belly size.   :)

Im rebuilding mine like a battle ship!

Ryan

  • M4wd Vendor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3803
  • Karma: +3/-3
  • Superstar
    • Lifetime LED
Re: 572
« Reply #186 on: July 27, 2012, 04:24:00 PM »

M4wdFab

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22493
  • Karma: +11/-22
Re: 572
« Reply #187 on: July 27, 2012, 05:17:00 PM »
yes, that is the bottom on the car!

M4wdFab

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22493
  • Karma: +11/-22
Re: 572
« Reply #188 on: July 29, 2012, 10:11:02 PM »
shit is getting real now!  time to order parts, i crossed the line tonight!




[attachment deleted by admin]

cracker

  • Free Loader
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1786
  • Karma: +3/-2
Re: 572
« Reply #189 on: July 29, 2012, 10:24:44 PM »
looks sweet..

M4wdFab

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22493
  • Karma: +11/-22
Re: 572
« Reply #190 on: July 29, 2012, 10:27:27 PM »
a couple lines will change a little, but i think thats the general idea.  Built around radiator fitting between the double pillars.  Looks like everything is laying out pretty good.  probably gona change the A pillar angle, i was trying to follow the campbell#8 car at that point, but i seem to have ended up with a huge window net opening again...



Wingman

  • Free Loader
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4596
  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: 572
« Reply #191 on: July 30, 2012, 08:30:54 AM »
Done by tomorrow's meeting?  ;D
Retired

Ryan

  • M4wd Vendor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3803
  • Karma: +3/-3
  • Superstar
    • Lifetime LED
Re: 572
« Reply #192 on: July 30, 2012, 09:57:26 AM »
That looks nice.

gif

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1754
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 572
« Reply #193 on: July 30, 2012, 11:35:32 AM »
I like the lines of this car.   Clean and simple.     


Question.   Why are the main hoops not complete single tubes?
« Last Edit: July 30, 2012, 11:38:11 AM by gif »

gif

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1754
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 572
« Reply #194 on: July 30, 2012, 11:40:20 AM »
NM.   i figured your going front to back  not side to side.